A funcoid related to directed topological spaces

The following problem arose from my attempt to re-express directed topological spaces in terms of funcoids. Conjecture Let $latex R$ be the complete funcoid corresponding to the usual topology on extended real line $latex [-\infty,+\infty] = \mathbb{R}\cup\{-\infty,+\infty\}$. Let $latex \geq$ be the order on this set. Then $latex R\sqcap^{\mathsf{FCD}}\mathord{\geq}$ is a complete funcoid.

Two equivalent conjectures

I have added to my book a short proof that the following two conjectures are equivalent: Conjecture $latex \mathrm{Compl}\,f \sqcap \mathrm{Compl}\,g = \mathrm{Compl}(f\sqcap g)$ for every reloids $latex f$ and $latex g$. Conjecture Meet of every two complete reloids is complete.

A new conjecture

While writing my book I overlooked to consider the following statement: Conjecture $latex f \sqcap \bigsqcup S = \bigsqcup \langle f \sqcap \rangle^{\ast} S$ for principal funcoid $latex f$ and a set $latex S$ of funcoids of appropriate sources and destinations.

A new theorem about generalized continuity

I had this theorem in mind for a long time, but formulated it exactly and proved only yesterday. Theorem $latex f \in \mathrm{C} (\mu \circ \mu^{- 1} ; \nu \circ \nu^{- 1}) \Leftrightarrow f \in \mathrm{C} (\mu; \nu)$ for complete endofuncoids $latex \mu$, $latex \nu$ and principal monovalued and entirely defined funcoid $latex f \in […]

A new easy theorem

I added a new easy to prove proposition to my book: Proposition An endofuncoid $latex f$ is $latex T_{1}$-separable iff $latex \mathrm{Cor}\langle f\rangle^{\ast}\{x\}\sqsubseteq\{x\}$ for every $latex x\in\mathrm{Ob}\, f$.

A vaguely formulated problem

Consider funcoid $latex \mathrm{id}^{\mathsf{FCD}}_{\Omega}$ (restricted identity funcoids on Frechet filter on some infinite set). Naturally $latex 1\in\mathrm{up}\, \mathrm{id}^{\mathsf{FCD}}_{\Omega}$ (where $latex 1$ is the identity morphism). But it also holds $latex \top^{\mathsf{FCD}}\setminus 1\in\mathrm{up}\, \mathrm{id}^{\mathsf{FCD}}_{\Omega}$ (where $latex 1$ is the identity morphism). This result is not hard to prove but quite counter-intuitive (that is is a paradox). […]

A new mapping from funcoids to reloids

Less than a hour ago I discovered a new mapping from funcoids to reloids: Definition $latex (\mathsf{RLD})_X f = \bigsqcap \left\{ g \in \mathsf{RLD} \mid (\mathsf{FCD}) g \sqsupseteq f \right\}$ for every funcoid $latex f$. Now I am going to work on the following conjectures: Conjecture $latex (\mathsf{RLD})_X f = \min \left\{ g \in \mathsf{RLD} […]

New proof of Urysohn’s lemma

I present a new proof of Urysohn’s lemma. Well, not quite: my proof is dependent on an unproved conjecture. Currently my proof is present in this PDF file. The proof uses theory of funcoids.

A math question

What are necessary and sufficient conditions for $latex \mathrm{up}\, f$ to be a filter for a funcoid $latex f$?