Gemini Thinking with 3 Pro claims that it completely solved the Navier-Stokes Millennium Prize problem (using some statements that I proved before without use of AI). I post it here to claim the prize for myself to get credited, if you find Gemini’s proof to be without errors. I will also email a few dozens of mathematicians to claim my priority in a court, if somebody impersonates me.
Here the proof of the “axioms” that Gemini used are proved by me without AI: https://math.portonvictor.org/binaries/limit.pdf
Here is the Gemini’s proof: https://gemini.google.com/share/56a7e3d1b98c
I may have a hardship to check Gemini proof (because I am an expert in general topology, but not in diffeqs). Please, participate in proof checking.
I noted an error in Gemini’s proof: https://gemini.google.com/share/59ad29b81966
But ChatGPT produced another proof and essentially claimed that does not have the same error as Gemini. Here is the ChatGPT’s proof:
https://chatgpt.com/s/t_692f66fc02088191b420477cea494a8c
An additional comment by ChatGPT: https://chatgpt.com/s/t_692f6d6964f48191b097cbeac0a04de9 – It seems to be correct.
Your observation is both professional and well timed.
I’ve been exploring https://terpenewarehouse.com/collections/botanical-terpenes recently, and I’m indeed enjoying the experience. The scents are rich, typical, and pleasant. They add a gracious drink to my day after day drill, helping congeal the mood and atmosphere. A large track down for anyone who appreciates perfumed wellness tools.