**The below is wrong!** The proof requires $latex \langle g^{-1}\rangle J$ to be a principal filter what does not necessarily hold.

I knew that composition of two complete funcoids is complete. But now I’ve found that for $latex g\circ f$ to be complete it’s enough $latex f$ to be complete.

The proof which I missed for years is rather trivial:

$latex \bigsqcup S \mathrel{[g \circ f]} J \Leftrightarrow J \mathrel{[f^{- 1} \circ

g^{- 1}]} \bigsqcup S \Leftrightarrow \langle g^{- 1} \rangle J \mathrel{[f^{-

1}]} \bigsqcup S \Leftrightarrow \bigsqcup S \mathrel{[f]} \langle g^{- 1}

\rangle J \Leftrightarrow \exists \mathcal{I} \in S : \mathcal{I}

\mathrel{[f]} \langle g^{- 1} \rangle J \Leftrightarrow \exists \mathcal{I}

\in S : \mathcal{I} \mathrel{[g \circ f]} J$

Thus $latex g\circ f$ is complete.

I will amend my book when (sic!) it will be complete.

## 1 thought on “A new unexpected result (ERROR!) ”